Golf giant Tiger Woods is reported to have ditched his Nike titanium driver. He is rumoured to be reaching for the trusty old Titleist 975D which swept him to the pinnacle of the golfing world back in 1999. Although Woods has signed lucrative endorsement contracts with Nike, who kit him out from head to foot (his five year clothing deal is reputed to have netted him $150m), his inability to maintain consistency with the Nike club, which was designed specially for him, has forced the switch.
The IPKat says: “When playing golf at the highest level, emulate Tiger Woods -- make sure there’s an opt-out clause in your endorsement contracts in case the product you’ve endorsed doesn’t deliver the goods”.
Compare Nike and Titleist products for yourself.
Sip a refreshing Tiger Woods here
Who wins when Tiger Woods plays golf with Stevie Wonder? Find out here
The IPKat says: “When playing golf at the highest level, emulate Tiger Woods -- make sure there’s an opt-out clause in your endorsement contracts in case the product you’ve endorsed doesn’t deliver the goods”.
Compare Nike and Titleist products for yourself.
Sip a refreshing Tiger Woods here
Who wins when Tiger Woods plays golf with Stevie Wonder? Find out here
TIGER EXERCISES OPT-OUT CLAUSE
![<strong>TIGER EXERCISES OPT-OUT CLAUSE</strong>]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Sunday, August 03, 2003
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html