Interesting article from the BBC examining the less obvious causes of the decline in CD sales. According to the article, it’s not just the fault of file-sharing as RIAA would have us believe. Piracy is also a major factor, so much so that it is claimed that 90% of CDs in China are pirate copies. However, more innocuously, part of the downturn in CD sales is due to the fact that people who in the 1980s and 90s were seeking to buy CDs to replace their vinyl collections have completed the process. Many of the people who do file-share do so because they just can’t get the heavily-plugged singles that they want alone without paying for a complete album which they don’t necessarily want. Finally, music isn’t as important to young people as it used to be with the rise of other distractions such as brands, clothing and of course, mobile phones. However, the article isn’t really clear whether this means that young people listen to less music or that that aren’t willing to pay for music because of the other demands on their finances and so are more likely to resort to file sharing.
Mark Mulligan, a consultant from Jupiter Research, whose site is a treasure trove of this type of thing, is heavily quoted. Read his blog here .
Mark Mulligan, a consultant from Jupiter Research, whose site is a treasure trove of this type of thing, is heavily quoted. Read his blog here .
IT'S NOT JUST FILE-SHARING
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Tuesday, August 05, 2003
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html