On 15 January the IPKat reported on a press release announcing a strike of employees of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM), the Office which administers Community trade marks (CTMs) and Community designs. He queried whether there really was a strike or whether the press release was a hoax. Well, he has since received clarification from the OHIM's Staff Committee to the effect that there had indeed been a strike. The strange form of the press release was the result of the Committee’s unfamiliarity with that medium. Almost all the coverage of the strike was in the Spanish media, which is why the IPKat had no luck seeking independent English-language corroboration of it.
The strikers’ Committee maintains that it is in the interests of the staff and the users that this action was carried out. It says:
“If the impression that little work is being done in the Office actually arises, this may well be due to the situation facing the staff. Too few people are having to carry out more and more tasks for which they were neither hired nor adequately trained. This causes longer and longer delays for cases which are difficult”.
Giving an example, the Committee cite the new OHIM policy of getting the secretarial staff to classify goods and services according to the Nice classification, a practice it describes as “a danger to the system”.
The IPKat would like to hear comments from the following: (i) employees who are anxious to expose poor working practices within the Office; (ii) CTM applicants and their representatives, who would like to mention either particularly good or particularly bad experiences arising from their dealings with OHIM and (iii) representatives of OHIM itself, who bear the responsibility for the efficient working of the CTM system.
Humble pie here and here
Hoaxes here
Hoaxes that turn out to be true here, here and here
The strikers’ Committee maintains that it is in the interests of the staff and the users that this action was carried out. It says:
“If the impression that little work is being done in the Office actually arises, this may well be due to the situation facing the staff. Too few people are having to carry out more and more tasks for which they were neither hired nor adequately trained. This causes longer and longer delays for cases which are difficult”.
Giving an example, the Committee cite the new OHIM policy of getting the secretarial staff to classify goods and services according to the Nice classification, a practice it describes as “a danger to the system”.
The IPKat would like to hear comments from the following: (i) employees who are anxious to expose poor working practices within the Office; (ii) CTM applicants and their representatives, who would like to mention either particularly good or particularly bad experiences arising from their dealings with OHIM and (iii) representatives of OHIM itself, who bear the responsibility for the efficient working of the CTM system.
Humble pie here and here
Hoaxes here
Hoaxes that turn out to be true here, here and here
ALICANTE "HOAX" TURNS OUT TO BE A REAL STRIKE
![ALICANTE "HOAX" TURNS OUT TO BE A REAL STRIKE]()
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Monday, January 26, 2004
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html