There was an interesting feature in yesterday’s Daily Telegraph about British fruit. The Environment Agency is seeking to rescue some of the less well-known British fruit varieties from extinction. Some of these rare strains have quaint and romantic names such as the Gilliflower dessert apple, the Port Wine Pippin and the Arlingham Schoolboys. Others have unsavoury names such as the Hens' Turds apple, Bloody Bastard pears and the Shit Smock plum, which may have caused consumers some embarrassment in the course of shopping for them.
The IPKat commends the Environment Agency for its diligence, but notes that the resurrection of the use of those fruits’ names may reduce the range of availability of names available for registration as trade marks. It should not be assumed that such terms, when applied to fruit, are automatically unregistrable as being contrary to morality just because they happen to be offensive.
Other strange apples: the apple of discord, the apple of one’s eye, the apple of desire, Snow White’s apple and The Big Apple
The IPKat commends the Environment Agency for its diligence, but notes that the resurrection of the use of those fruits’ names may reduce the range of availability of names available for registration as trade marks. It should not be assumed that such terms, when applied to fruit, are automatically unregistrable as being contrary to morality just because they happen to be offensive.
Other strange apples: the apple of discord, the apple of one’s eye, the apple of desire, Snow White’s apple and The Big Apple
MIND WHAT YOU CALL THAT APPLE!
![MIND WHAT YOU CALL THAT APPLE!]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Friday, January 23, 2004
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html