Post by Jeremy and Ilanah:
The COMBIVIR and EPIVIR tablets must be forwarded to drug regulators in each country in which they are sold, for reapproval with the red formulation. GSK will have to show that the red pills do not deteriorate on the shelf at a different rate from the existing white ones. The accelerated data must be available for three to six months before approval is forthcoming. The new colouring must also obtain certification from the European authorities so that they can be submitted to the international markets. This is not the first time that a drug company has differentiated products between the developed and developing worlds. Pfizer's DIFLUCAN, a treatment for thrush, is sold in capsule form in regular dealings and given in a tablet form to relief agencies and other third world channels.
The IPKat regrets that so much medicine destined for the poor and needy in developing countries finds its way into the hands of profiteers who sell it back into well-supplied developed markets rather than enabling its intended beneficiaries to regain their health or improve their quality of life. He is also astonished that the activities of GSK, a company that provides discounted medicines to some 100 developing countries, should so consistently the subject of criticism when the activities of largely anonymous parallel trading profiteers appear to escape censure.
Some perspectives on pharmaceutical profiteering here, here and here
COLOUR-CODED DRUGS TO BEAT PROFITEERS
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Thursday, January 01, 2004
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html