The Telegraph reports that the UK food industry has been accused of using children's characters such as Bagpuss, Shrek and Scooby Doo to promote foods high in salt, sugar and fat. A study by the consumer group Which? found that 18 popular characters from film and television were being used to market sugary snacks, crisps and processed food. Which? accused food manufacturers of manipulating parents and encouraging "pester power" and called for a review into the way children's characters were licensed.

Bagpuss: looks harmless enough, beware the salty pasta

According to the Which? survey of 2,000 people, more than three quarters said the use of cartoon figures on junk food made it harder for parents to say no to their children. Nick Stace, of Which?, said:
"Licensing companies and food manufacturers have to take responsibility to tackle the diet and health crisis. The Food Standards Agency needs to develop a standard setting out nutritional criteria for when these characters can be used."
The childhood obesity epidemic of the past few decades has triggered concerns at the influence of junk food advertising. Nearly a third of children are overweight, while 16 per cent of two- to 15-year-olds are clinically obese. Food campaigners are also concerned at levels of salt in children's processed foods. One of the products highlighted - a small tin of HP's Bagpuss pasta shapes in tomato sauce - contained 3.75g of salt, almost double the 2g of salt a child aged between one and three should consume in a day and more than the 3g recommended for a child aged four to six.

The food and advertising industries said that they were working with the Government to tackle childhood obesity. The Advertising Association said its code of advertising was under review but it believed more could be achieved if the industry helped the Government and food companies to "educate and motivate" people into improving their diets.

The Advertising Association: occasional roars from a toothless tiger?

Industry responses:
* Kellogg's: "We are committed to responsibly marketing our brands and communicating their intrinsic qualities so that our customers can make informed choices".

* Nestlé: "We work closely with industry and government bodies and this includes the review of our own and industry practices and guidelines".
The Government wants restrictions on advertising and promotion to children of foods and drinks high in fat, salt and sugar. It hopes this will be done through voluntary agreements, but has given the industry a deadline of 2007 to act.

The IPKat wonders whether danger-foods should carry government health warnings, just like cigarettes. Merpel asks why the papers ever bother publishing the manufacturers' comments. They only ever say how wonderful and responsible they are.

Really dangerous foods here and here
Safe food kills too: see here and here
DOES BAGPUSS KILL KIDS? DOES BAGPUSS KILL KIDS? Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, February 24, 2005 Rating: 5


  1. Think that will drive you some extra traffic?

  2. Yo, This blog is pretty neat. You should check out mine sometime. It pretty much covers opt in e mail list maintenance related stuff.

  3. If you are in business and are interested in business travel uk and FREE advertising and marketing. Try this site, it costs nothing, but a little time

  4. a lot of premium products and services being offered for free. What’s best is that there is a seemingly

  5. What a great blog for best diet pill. I am going to have to bookmark this blog for when I want to learn more about best diet pill.

    I think anyone interested in best diet pill would find my site interesting and entertaining. Stop by when you have time.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.