Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / EIPR FEBRUARY 2005

EIPR FEBRUARY 2005

-

The February issue of Sweet & Maxwell's European Intellectual Property Review has now been published. It contains some good stuff. For example:
* Olivier Lemaire (NautaDutilh's Brussels office) writes on parallel trade in pharma products in the recently enlarged European Union;

* Philippe de Jong (Altius) explains the role and future prospects of the Belgian torpedo as a means of slowing down unwanted patent litigation;

* IPKat co-author Ilanah explains why it's no fun being a Community trade mark examiner, reviewing the OHIM Board of Appeal decision in Whitening Multi-Action;

Lambretta tracktops: colourways can't be protected in the UK

* Roland Mallison and Claire Young (Linklaters) wax lyrical on the lacunae in design protection that were so clearly revealed in the recent UK Lambretta case.
EIPR FEBRUARY 2005 EIPR FEBRUARY 2005 Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, February 18, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousFriday, 4 November 2005 at 03:24:00 GMT

    a lot of premium products and services being offered for free. What’s best is that there is a seemingly

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.