CASE REFRESHES THE PARTS OTHER COPYRIGHT LAWYERS CAN'T REACH


On Sunday, the Sunday Business Post reported that the Irish company Sonarstate is contemplating suing Heineken and its advertising agency, McCann Erickson, for copyright infringement. Sonarstate claims that the Speakerhead character used in Heineken’s “Where’s your head at?” campaign infringed its copyright in the Speakerboy character that Sonarstate used in its marketing campaign which involved Eircell and Sony Music. It is thought that Sonarstate was planning to use the Speakerboy character in its next round of advertising.

The IPKat is interested to see how this one goes. In particular, he will be interested to know whether there will be any discussion of whether fictional characters can be protected by copyright – always a controversial issue.

Past Heineken advertisements of note here, here and here
CASE REFRESHES THE PARTS OTHER COPYRIGHT LAWYERS CAN'T REACH CASE REFRESHES THE PARTS OTHER COPYRIGHT LAWYERS CAN'T REACH Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. Think that will drive you some extra traffic?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you! The information and Internet marketing product evaluations that you provide are great for beginner webmasters.

    Now, I have a related home business internet marketing site/blog. It pretty much covers home business internet marketing related stuff. In addition, I supply the secrets that I used to make $12,124 from Google Adsense last month.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.