Part 1 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ("the Act") confers copyright on the creators of certain works. Part 2 of the Act confers rights on performers and persons having recording rights in relation to a performance. The purpose of this Order is to apply Part 1 of the Act to works originating from other countries and to confer on certain countries reciprocal protection under Part 2 of the Act. In this Order the term "country" includes territories, by reason of sections 178 and 211 of the Act.The IPKat was initially a little daunted, but the tabular approach adopted in the Schedule to this SI works really well. Its authors are to be congratulated. Now, perhaps, they will turn their approach to the big job that remains to be done -- rationalising the bizarre arrangement of sections in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act itself. Merpel says, "never mind the copyright -- the Schedule provides the best list of holiday destinations I've ever seen".
By reason of section 153(3) of the Act this Order will not affect works in which copyright already subsists. Further, by reason of paragraph 35 of Schedule 1 to the Act, any work in which copyright subsisted under the Copyright Act 1956 (c. 74) is deemed to satisfy the requirements of qualification for copyright protection.
Article 2 qualifies literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, films and typographical arrangements of published editions for copyright protection where they are connected to the countries indicated in the second column in the Schedule. All of those countries are parties to the Berne Copyright Convention (Cmnd. 5002), to the Universal Copyright Convention (Cmnd. 4905) or to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation (Cmnd. 2556-59) (including the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Cmnd. 2561-69, 2571-74)) or are member States of the European Community or the European Free Trade Agreement; or otherwise give adequate protection under their laws.
Article 3 qualifies sound recordings for copyright protection where they are connected to the countries indicated in the third column of the Schedule. The protection extends to lending, playing in public or broadcasting if the country of origin is marked by an asterisk. All such countries are parties to the International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations (Cmnd. 2425) ("the Rome Convention") or are member States of the European Community or the European Free Trade Agreement; or otherwise give adequate protection under their laws.
Different protection is given to those countries marked by a hash. All such countries are parties to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) Performances and Phonograms Treaty (Cmnd. 3736) ("the WPPT"), but not parties to the Rome Convention. The United Kingdom has not ratified the WPPT, but it has agreed to ratify it along with the European Community and with the other member States in accordance with Council Decision 2000/278/EC (O.J. No L 89, 11.4.2000, p. 6). Protection is therefore accorded to contracting parties in anticipation of ratification on the basis that upon ratification those countries will provide protection under their laws.
Article 4 qualifies wireless broadcasts for copyright protection where they are connected to the countries indicated in the fourth column of the Schedule. These countries are parties to the Rome Convention or are member States of the European Community or the European Free Trade Agreement; or otherwise give adequate protection under their laws.
Those countries marked by an asterisk, which receive more limited protection, are parties to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (including TRIPs), but not to the Rome Convention. Protection does not extend to wireless broadcasts made before the specified dates. By reason of paragraph 9(a) of Schedule 1 to the Act, protection never extends to such broadcasts made before 1st June 1957.
Article 5 qualifies broadcasts (other than wireless broadcasts) for copyright protection where they are connected to the countries indicated in the fifth column of the Schedule. These countries are member States of the European Community or the European Free Trade Agreement or otherwise give adequate protection under their laws. By reason of paragraph 9(b) of Schedule 1 to the Act, protection does not extend to such broadcasts made before 1st January 1985.
Article 6(1) grants reciprocal protection to certain countries in respect of their performers and persons having recording rights. These countries are parties to the Rome Convention.
Article 6(2) applies where it is not possible to grant reciprocal protection, but the United Kingdom is obliged to grant limited protection to performers, by reason of both it and the European Community being party to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (including TRIPs). All such countries are marked with an asterisk.
This article also grants reciprocal protection to certain countries (those not marked with an asterisk) for the making available of a performance, by reason of the United Kingdom's and the European Community's undertaking to become a party to of the WPPT.
Article 7 is a savings provision.
This Order uses powers given by the Act and by the European Communities Act 1972 to implement various Community obligations of the United Kingdom. The powers under the Act are also used to implement certain other international obligations.
This Order consolidates, and updates, those Orders revoked by Article 8.
1 comment:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
Read your blog on national grants and thought you might want to review my site which includes information on college grants. Thought you or your readers might be interested.
ReplyDelete