UK PATENT OFFICE SOFTWARE PATENT WORKSHOP


ZDNet reports on the workshop held by the UK Patent Office concerning the EU software patent directive. It won’t come as much of a surprise to learn that the attendees, who included software developers and patent lawyers weren’t impressed by the Directive. They claim that the criteria for deciding if a patent should be granted are so vague that almost all software patent applications will be granted. The UK Patent Office, which has helped to steer the legislation through to its second reading later this month, denies that this is the case. The group also considered a number of fictional case-studies and an alternative definition of “technical contribution” proposed by the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure. The workshop formed part of a series of 13 which have been held across the UK.

Cute…but do they qualify for patent protection?

The IPKat is interested to know what will come out of the results of these workshops. Watch this space.

Computer-related inventions here, here, here and here
UK PATENT OFFICE SOFTWARE PATENT WORKSHOP UK PATENT OFFICE SOFTWARE PATENT WORKSHOP Reviewed by Anonymous on Sunday, April 10, 2005 Rating: 5

3 comments:

  1. Hi there, I thought you might be interest in this is you are interested inebook online selling I have found a great site aboutebook online selling

    Nioce looking blog by the way

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am about to show you a way that you can generate thousands of keyword targeted links back to your web site starting today!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Learn how to quickly create an RSS feeds with our RSS feeder, for high link popularity and ultimately better search engine rankings.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.