Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / "AYATOLLAHS OF FREE ENTERPRISE" ROW MAY SPARK OFF A CHANGE OF COURT

"AYATOLLAHS OF FREE ENTERPRISE" ROW MAY SPARK OFF A CHANGE OF COURT

-

Don't read on unless you enjoy the interminable posturings between IP-rich Microsoft and the jealous guardians of consumers' rights known as the European Commission, but the IPKat enjoyed reading this in The Register today.

The Commission's view of Microsoft -- or fair comment?

Microsoft v The European Commission before the European Court of Justice here
Google hits for "unbundled Windows Media" here

"AYATOLLAHS OF FREE ENTERPRISE" ROW MAY SPARK OFF A CHANGE OF COURT "AYATOLLAHS OF FREE ENTERPRISE" ROW MAY SPARK OFF A CHANGE OF COURT Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, June 20, 2005 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousSaturday, 29 October 2005 at 14:45:00 GMT+1

    Get 1000s of Links pointing back to Your Site... Starting Today!

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousMonday, 31 October 2005 at 19:21:00 GMT

    Would The Thought Of Thousands Of Other Web Site's All Displaying Your Content,

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.