Edward Tomlinson of Frohwitter has tipped the IPKat off about a German trade mark reference to the ECJ. He writes:
The IPKat says thanks Edward! Merpel says, this ought to fuel some debate.Following the referral to the ECJ in respect of Class International v Unilever. The Federal Court of Justice has also referred a case regarding transit of trade marked goods.
This case relates to clothes bearing the mark DIESEL which is registered in Germany but not in the Republic of Ireland, the home of the defendant. The defendant has jeans produced in Poland and these are transported, via Germany, to Ireland. The Court ín Germany has referred the question as to whether the registered mark gives the proprietor the right to prohibit the simple transfer of goods bearing the mark. Directive 89/104/EEC provides explicitly for a prohibition of importing or exporting goods which infringe the mark but not a prohibition for goods in transit.
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html