Copyright talk at QMIPRINext Monday (6 February) at 12.30pm Lior Zemer, Lecturer in Law at the University of Leicester and Visiting Assistant Professor at Boston University School of Law, will be speaking on copyright at QMIPRI. His subject is "A Riposte to Lockean Copyright Theorists".
John Locke (almost) live at QMIPRI
All are welcome and there’s no charge for attending but please RSVP to Ilanah. Full details are available here.
Japan examines copyright law on broadcasts
Asahi.com reports that the Japanese Intellectual Property Strategy Headquarters is campaigning for revisions to the copyright law that will make it easier for ISPs to provide television programmes over the internet. Currently broadcasters need only pay fees to copyright owners after the programme is aired by conventional telelvision, but broadcasters and ISPs must obtain copyright clearance before showing any programme over the internet. The need for prior approval is said to have blocked the development of internet television services.
The proposed revision of the Copyright Law would redefine the distribution of TV programs offered to homes through communication facilities, including fiber-optic cables and broadband services, as "wired broadcasting," making a wider category of transmission types eligible for the ex post facto approval system. Any bill that might result from the Strategy HQ's work is expected in December 2007.The IPKat thinks that this makes a lot of sense. It’ll open broadcasting up to competition and the distinction between conventional TV broadcasts and internet broadcasts doesn’t seem to be one based on principle.
LOCKED IN DEBATE IN LONDON AND JAPAN
![LOCKED IN DEBATE IN LONDON AND JAPAN]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Monday, January 30, 2006
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html