POLICE DOGS BENEFIT FROM DESIGNER KNOCK-OFFS


The IPKat has learnt from Leeds Today that counterfeit clothing had been donated by West Yorkshire Trading Standards to West Yorkshire Police Force to help the police to train their sniffer dogs. Normally the dogs are trained by uniformed handlers, but most criminals tend not to wear uniforms, and so the counterfeit clothing and handbags will be used to make the dogs’ training more realistic. West Yorkshire’s Chief Training Standards Officer said:
"It is pleasing to see that the illegal clothing seized in these operations is being put to a good use…Previously some clothing had been recycled through charities in this country and abroad but this is a new angle, which we are very pleased to develop for the future.".
The IPKat is in two minds about this policy. On the one hand he doesn’t like to see things wasted, but on the other hand there seems to be a nice little market growing in recycled counterfeit goods. If it’s wrong for counterfeiters and middle-men to deal in counterfeit goods then surely it isn’t right for others to deal in them either? Merpel says using counterfeits isn’t very realistic – every self-respecting criminal is bound to be wearing the real thing.
POLICE DOGS BENEFIT FROM DESIGNER KNOCK-OFFS POLICE DOGS BENEFIT FROM DESIGNER KNOCK-OFFS Reviewed by Unknown on Monday, January 02, 2006 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. Using confiscated counterfeit clothing seems to be benefitting from the proceeds of crime.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are we worried about benefiting from a crime, if it's not the perpetrator of the crime who benefits but someone else who is morally blameless?

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.