Google wins cache victory

MediaPost reports that Google has won an American copyright infringement case. Author and lawyer Blake A. Field argued that Google’s cached page function (by which it makes copies of websites so that users can access the copies if the original website goes down) was infringing. However, District Judge Robert C. Jones found that Google’s activities constituted fair use.

There has been speculation about whether this bodes well for Google in its attempts to scan books and make them searchable via its service. The IPKat isn’t convinced though. The GooglePrint service would compete with conventional published editions whereas the cached page service comes into its own when the original website isn’t working.

More on Google’s caching service here.

Drawing bugs VW

Autoblog reports that Volkswagen has sent a cease and desist letter to American artist Don Stewart. The letter concerns a pen and ink drawing of a VW Beetle with fantasy decoration. VW claim that the sale of copies of the drawing infringes its trade dress and seeks to

"capitalize on and profit from the goodwill and reputation of VWoA by misappropriating VWoA's registered trademarks and trade dress in its products."

Stewart’s drawing

The IPKat can’t understand this. First of all, the picture appears to be an affectionate tribute and not really worth making a fuss about. Secondly, it’s rather hard to succeed on a US misappropriation claim.
... MEANWHILE IN THE US ... MEANWHILE IN THE US Reviewed by Unknown on Saturday, January 28, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. I agree that the ruling won't directly help Google in the book search case, since it is based on the fact that Internet content is available for free to everyone.

    I don't agree with that particular opinion, however. It seems to be rather one-sided. I have a couple of long posts discussing it on my blog.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.