It's that website again ...The IPKat's friend Sue Scott wrote to him yesterday on the subject of the UK Patent Office website (see earlier posts here, here and here):
"This morning I had a response to a caveat I filed online a few months ago. I click the link, I get taken to:The IPKat suspects that Sue is not the only person on the planet who may have had this experience. If nothing else, he hopes that other public bodies that are about to launch website changes upon an unsuspecting world will take a little extra time to consult and check things out before they do so.
"Page not found
The Patent Office web site was redesigned on September 24th 2006
You have been referrred to a page that no longer exists from another website.
Unfortunately, we are unable to offer an equivalent page at this time so you will be automatically redirected to the new Patent Office home page in 10 seconds.
If you are not redirected then please use this link".
Words fail me!"
IP Enforcement and Remedies conference
The IPKat reminds you of the upcoming conference, IP Enforcement and Remedies: an international perspective on enforcement of rights and injunctive relief, which is coming up on 31 October in Central London, courtesy of LexisNexis Butterworths. It has got a great cast of speakers and touches on some highly topical issues - after all, IP rights aren't worth a cent if they're not backed up by a proper scheme for enforcing them. More details are available here.
IT'S THAT WEBSITE AGAIN ...; IP ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES CONFERENCE
![IT'S THAT WEBSITE AGAIN ...; IP ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES CONFERENCE]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Thursday, October 05, 2006
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html