The IPKat is grateful to Niamh Hall and Michael Hicks, who both tipped him off about Wayne Rooney’s successful bid to have the domain name transferred to him.

The registrant claimed that he obtained the domain name in 2002, after seeing the then sixteen-year old Rooney playing for Everton, being convinced of his potential, and then being motivated to obtain the domain name to set up a fan site which never eventuated.

The Administrative Pannel of the WIPO Mediation and Arbitration Centre ordered that the mark be transferred.

The domain name was found to be identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark, even though Wayne Rooney only registered his trade mark after the domain name was registered, since trade marks registered after domain names can result in a finding of identical or confusing similarity under the UDRP (though it’s harder to find bad faith where the domain name predates the trade mark).

Mr Rooney (right) celebrates another successful domain name decision

The registrant’s supposed desire to set up a fan site did not give him a legitimate interest because this intention was not particularly believable. The panellist in particular highlights that the registrant had no programming experience at the time of registration and did nothing subsequently in order to acquire such skills.

The domain name had been registered or used in bad faith, even though it pre-dated the trade mark registration since, at the time, Rooney had goodwill in the Liverpool area.

The IPKat has some sympathy with the end result here, since he can’t think why the registrant would want Rooney’s name as a domain name, except to extract money from him in the future. However, there’s a strong degree of artificiality about the first step of minding the domain name to be similar to a mark that hadn’t been registered at the time of registration. Domain name applicants can’t be expected to be fortune tellers who work out what their domain names might eventually conflict with. He can’t see though why passing off wasn’t raised as the ‘earlier mark’ at this first point though, which would have avoided the difficulty.
ROONEY DOMAIN NAME OFFSIDE ROONEY DOMAIN NAME OFFSIDE Reviewed by Unknown on Wednesday, October 18, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. You may find the reasoning in the decision a little more in allignment with passing off logic.
    See Andrew Murray's expert opinion at :


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.