SOME WORDS FROM THE IPKAT'S READERS


More from Singapore

The IPKat is grateful to Daniel Lee for pointing out that last week’s MacCoffee/McCafe case from Singapore is available online.

European patent meeting

Freedrik Nelsson writes with an invitation for IPKat readers to the STOA Workshop on Policy options for the European patent system

Date November 9th, 2006
Time 9am - 5pm
Who Open to the public
Where The European Parliament, 60, Rue Wiertz, Brussels, Belgium
Description The purpose of the patent system is to stimulate innovation
and growth. In recent years, it has expanded to cover new technologies, such as biotechnology and information and communication technology (ICT), and an increasing number of patents have been granted. This has raised many concerns. Does the patent system still fulfil its objectives, or does it, in some areas, hamper innovation?

The purpose of the workshop is to evaluate the system as it stands today and to discuss the need for reforms within the following focus areas:

* Flexibility and dynamism of the patent system

* Patents and access to market

* Governance of the patent system

In order to participate in the workshop, please register (at
http://www.tekno.dk/subpage.php3?page=statisk/online_skema/patent-system.php ).
Registration has to be done before November 1st and there are a limited number of seats.
SOME WORDS FROM THE IPKAT'S READERS SOME WORDS FROM THE IPKAT'S READERS Reviewed by Unknown on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.