Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / OHIM STATS

OHIM STATS


The IPKat brings you the excitement of the official OHIM statistics for 2006, which are now online and available here. Points of note include:

* 2006 marks the tenth anniversary of the CTM, and with it, the first batch of renewals. The stats show that the renewal rate was 60%;

* Top EU country for CTM applications is Germany (no surprises there, then);

* Top non-EU country for CTM applications is the US (no surprises there then either);

* There were no applications for olfactory marks during 2006. However, a small number of sound and colour marks were both applied for and registered during that period;

* Only one CTM application has ever originated from the Vatican City State. This puts it in the company of Iraq and Cuba. No further applications originating from there were made during 2006;

* The first CTM application from Papua New Guinea was received this year.
OHIM STATS OHIM STATS Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, October 23, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousWednesday, 25 October 2006 at 18:33:00 GMT+1

    Peter Lawrence from OHIM writes: Be careful with the interpretation of these figures, because the 2006 figures only represent the year so far. With renewals for example, we saw over 75% for the big tranche with April 1996 filing dates, and it has been over 63% since with later registrations.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.