

The decision of the High Court for England and Wales in Jules Rimet Cup Ltd v Football Association (the "World Cup Willie" trade mark case) was noted on Monday by the IPKat here. It's now available in full on BAILII, so you can read it here.

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
Next time I am in London I promise to treat the IPKat to a refreshing caipirinha in the nearest cocktail bar. It seems that in both Alicante and Luxembourg people are more up-to-date in the field of Brazilian cocktails...
ReplyDeleteThe Caipirinha depicted above does not have enough ice, maybe it got a bit warm while being photographed. The CFI accepted -- quite rightly in my opinion, at least from a German perspective -- that "Caipi" is a common short form for Caipirinha, even though this word is not explicitly listed in a dictionary.
ReplyDeleteIs there a costs decision in the World Cup Wilie case?
ReplyDeleteJudging by the end of the judgment probably will be interesting reading!