The Commonwealth Business Council: has it a role in developing IP internationally?

Chairing the "IP in Africa" session of the Licensing Executives Society (LES) Britain & Ireland Annual Conference today, IPKat team blogger Jeremy came across an organisation he'd never heard of before, the Commonwealth Business Council (CBC). Representing the CBC was Peter Longworth CMG, who described the Council's constitution and functions, describing its current interest in at least two fairly sensitive IP issues: counterfeit medicines in Africa as a whole and the absence of cogent copyright protection to support Nigeria's Nollywood film industry.

Do any readers of this weblog have any experience of the CBC which they can share here? Is it another valuable catalyst for achieving further and balanced progress in the protection of IP in developing countries (which is what most of the Commonwealth's members are), or is it merely a tiresomely duplicative Johnny-come-lately that will be of no real relevance in the increasingly crowded international IP arena? Please post your comments below or email the IPKat, with the subject headline "CBC", here.

More on the Commonwealth here
The original Commonwealth here
More on IP in Africa here
The Commonwealth Business Council: has it a role in developing IP internationally? The Commonwealth Business Council: has it a role in developing IP internationally? Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, July 02, 2008 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Friday Book recommendation (day early):

    Can anyone recommend a couple of IP books (presumably textbook and casebook) to a recent CPE / GDL graduate who wishes to acquire some expertise in IP?

    Or, what books are recommended in support of a specialist IP course?

    In anticipation, thanks.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.