No excitement after 8pm

The IPKat can now reveal that leave to appeal to the House of Lords has been refused in Eli Lilly and Company and others v 8PM Chemist Limited. This was the case in which 8PM enabled US patients to obtain cheap prescription drugs from Turkey via a rather circuitous route which passed through the UK, where Eli Lilly had some trade marks which, it considered, this trade route infringed. At first instance Mann J was willing to continue an injunction in force against 8PM even though the offending drugs weren't placed on the market in the UK, since there was at least an arguable case of infringement on the facts (see note here). The Court of Appeal disagreed and discharged the injunction. Regarding this decision the IPKat said
"The IPKat can't fault the reasoning of the Court of Appeal, but he feels unhappy at the result. ... [A]ny set of rules that requires such a roundabout business model in order to comply with the formal rules relating to trade mark infringement creates the impression that something dodgy is being done".
Merpel says, can anyone remember the name of the person concerning whom it was once said:
"His idea of excitement is to eat an After Eight at 7.45"?
No excitement after 8pm No excitement after 8pm Reviewed by Jeremy on Sunday, July 06, 2008 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.