British government clowning around with patents -- but no-one's laughing

The IPKat is astounded to read, on the BBC's coverage of the British pre-budget report, a bullet-point which reads as follows:
"New 10% tax on income from patents to boost science development".
The Telegraph is more specific: Corporation Tax at the rate of 10% is to be introduced on income from patents. This, explains easyBourse, is "a bid to underpin the life sciences and technology industries" according to Chancellor Alastair Darling who reassuringly adds: "I want to encourage research into pharmaceuticals and the biotechnology industry".

On the assumption that this is not a practical joke, it now seems that the British government is set to tax the fruits of research and development in order to fund ... research and development. What a wonderful incentive to invest, particularly when other countries are encouraging R&D by doing the exact opposite. Merpel says, don't worry: Britain's best tax brains will soon find ways of showing that the income in question isn't derived from patents at all, and the government's coffers will be none the fuller.

Taxation of income from patents in Belgium here
Tax-friendly regime for intellectual assets in Ireland here

NOTE: this post should be read in conjunction with that which follows it here.
British government clowning around with patents -- but no-one's laughing British government clowning around with patents -- but no-one's laughing Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. It's a cut, not a new tax. Snuck in to the budget almost un-noticed, no doubt part of some larger conspiracy.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.