Wednesday whimsies

The IPKat thanks his friend André Heitz for drawing his attention to Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. Daniel Kirchhof WIPO Case No. D2009-1661, a domain name dispute resolution decision involving the grand total of 1,542 domain names. For the record, the complainant won 1,519 and lost 10, the balance being withdrawn.

The Blaca Prize is coming up for grabs again. Blaca is the British Literary and Artistic Copyright Association -- the British cell of militant copyright movement ALAI. The trick is to write a brilliant essay on UK Law of Copyright and Related Rights, which must be submitted by 31 March 2o1o. Rules of entry for the Blaca Prize can be found here. The IPKat notes that Blaca is also planning its own blog: if you're interested, join Blaca and contribute to it!

Not to be outdone, the International Max Planck Research School for Competition and Innovation - Legal and Economic Determinants (yes, that's its name!) has its own newly-instituted International Essay Competition. The topic is "Designing an Inclusive National Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: Legal, Economic, and Social Perspectives". The deadline isn't until 1 May 2010, but you'd better start writing soon if you want to win. Rules for the competition may be found on Maxi's website here. Requests for further information and for clarification may be emailed to Mrinalini Kochupillai.

Want to know more about the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)? Don't we all! The Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property (PIJIP) is compiling an information resource on ACTA. It includes 11 leaked documents as well as a host of other items of material. The IPKat thanks PIJIP for this initiative. Merpel adds, if we're all going to be kept in ignorance, we can at least be better informed ...
Wednesday whimsies Wednesday whimsies Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, February 03, 2010 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.