"Green grow the patents, Oh"

The IPKat is grateful to his distinguished friend Richard Gallafent for drawing his attention to the fact that a link to the UK Intellectual Property Office's "green patent database" has now been posted, here.

Right: the IPO is hoping to cultivate a new generation of green inventors ...

Richard notes the curious current distribution of green patents by country of residence of their proprietors. Of the 100 published applicationss in the database so far, the breakdown is:
United Kingdom 82
United States 11
Denmark 2
with the balance coming in the form of single patents from Spain, Hong Kong, Ireland, Singapore and Mauritius. One possible reason for this is that the UK IPO has not managed to sell this excellent service overseas very well so far -- or perhaps innovators from major inventing countries such as Japan and Germany are quietly using the Green Channel as an exceptional value for money, high-speed evaluation tool and then quietly withdrawing the applications before publication. There may be other explanations. Says Richard, "it will be interesting to see what the balance looks like in a few month's time, when the publications start to occur in cases where green channel processing was sought on filing; apart from early published ones, they will emerge from November 2010 onwards".

Other green patents ...
Green tea patents here and here
Green tyre patent here
Green chlorination of silver patent here
Green liquor for use in ethanol production here
"Green grow the patents, Oh" "Green grow the patents, Oh" Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, June 10, 2010 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.