Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Bob Kohn / Comics / e-book price-fixing / US v Apple Inc / A Comic is Worth a 1,000 Authorities

A Comic is Worth a 1,000 Authorities

- , , ,
As if living and working in New York and being an expert in music licensing law wasn't cool enough, lawyer Bob Kohn has now transcended to the status of super cool, in this Kat's opinion, by filing a friend-of-the-court five page brief in comic book format, opposing a settlement in e-book price-fixing case U.S. v. Apple Inc., 12-cv-02826.

Legal Cheek reports here and Bloomberg here.

Here's a snippet:

The full brief is available from Scribd here.


A Comic is Worth a 1,000 Authorities A Comic is Worth a 1,000 Authorities Reviewed by Kate Manning on Thursday, September 06, 2012 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousFriday, 7 September 2012 at 15:40:00 GMT+1

    It may help the Judge but there are still a lot of big and confusing words.

    It's not very realistic. After he responded to her initial question her answer would have been: "OK darling sounds cool best of luck I'm just going to watch an old episode of Friends and then I'm off to bed. Don't wake me!"

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.