Bad news: Posh Spice didn't get the job

Following yesterday's shock news that Lord Marland had stepped down as the UK's Minister responsible (sic) for Intellectual Property, and the launch of an exciting rumour that he might be replaced by an elevated Lady Beckham, Politics Live with Andrew Sparrow reports:
... Viscount Younger of Leckie has been made a junior business minister, replacing Lord Marland ...
Viscount Younger of Leckie is that curious creature of British politics, an elected hereditary peer, and deputy chairman of the Buckingham Constituency Conservative Association.  You can peruse his Lords biography here.
Bad news: Posh Spice didn't get the job Bad news: Posh Spice didn't get the job Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, January 09, 2013 Rating: 5


  1. His father was a heavy-hitter in previous Conservative Govt. Let's hope he is too. There are other politicians' offspring doing well in the HL, eg Lord Attlee.

  2. Mark, you say Viscount Younger's father was a heavy-hitter and the blog says he's a hereditary peer. Are minor British ministers the result of some sort of selective breeding programme?

    1. There's a special intellectual property right - a bit like plant breeders' rights - called Primogeniture Right. Holders of the right have something called "father's privilege". Unfortunately, genetic mutation often causes degradation of the seed stock, making investment in the right a highly risky business. Not suitable for unsophisticated investors.

  3. The Viscount even has a Polish Wikipedia entry. Very promising!

  4. Posh Spice might be better qualified.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.