This brief blogpost is a renewed request for assistance. As mentioned a couple of weeks ago in an earlier round-up post, this Kat has been asked to help find a speaker for a conference in Central Europe in early December. Alas, no response was received but, since the information might have been too deeply buried among the other items in the same blogpost, the request is repeated here:
 |
| Want a chance to speak? |
Conference looking for a speaker. Might it be you? The IPKat is currently looking, on behalf of a reputable international organisation, for a in-house intellectual property who is able to say something interesting about the issued faced by his or her company in coping with situations in which there is an overlap between trade mark rights and copyrights.
The conference takes place in early December on the European mainland; it will be well attended and the speaker will be treated to two very comfortable nights in a jolly good hotel. If you think you might be that person, can you please email the IPKat at theipkat@gmail.com with the subject line "IP overlap", ideally giving a short explanation of why the speaker at this prestigious event should be you. All applications will be treated in confidence and will be forwarded to the conference organisers, who will deal directly with you. Thanks!
Lovely hotel too!
Speaker needed: might it be you?
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Monday, October 06, 2014
Rating:
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Monday, October 06, 2014
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html