The IPKat
is happy to publish a new guest contribution by David Serras Pereira (SPAutores), who – this
time – reflects on the recent news items concerning Facebook and its investments
in music-related activities.
Here’s what David writes:
“Over the past few weeks, the main headings
of all news regarding Facebook have been linked to the now world-famous
Cambridge Analytica scandal. With the GDPR arriving like a Tsunami into our
lives (and our clients ‘lives!) it is natural that our attention has been mainly
focused on this.
Yet, the social media giant is making
not so heard moves that will allow it to keep a huge market portion of one of
the most desired businesses: music! And why is that? Like Lou Rawls once said:
“Music is the greatest communication in the world. Even if people don't
understand the language that you're singing in, they still know good music when
they hear it.”
As we once said on this blog (here),
Facebook global music strategy comes from the early beginnings of 2017, when it
began hiring former executives from the music business (Tamara Hrivnak),
opening positions for top tier jobs in the music licensing relations with
labels and collective management organizations, creating its "own-music"
projects like SOUND COLLECTION, and very recently with the licensing agreements
for the use of music with HFA/Rumblefish, Kobalt, Global Music Rights,
Universal Music Group, Sony ATV and SESAC.
Not-so-heard recent (and huge) news
about Facebook is that:
- the licensing deals made with top-tier
French CMO SACEM (here),
one on behalf of Universal Music Publishing International (December), and the
others (announced on the 16th of March), covering the use of Sacem’s
repertoire, Wixen Music Publishing’s repertoire and SOCAN (Canadian CMO), that cover
more than 180 territories and include licensing for Facebook, Instagram,
Messenger and Oculus;
- last week’s MBW release and detailed
analysis (here)
that Facebook will expand its music business into Asia-Pacific region, by filling
two senior positions for newly created roles, targeting both copyright/authors’
rights (Music Publishing Business Development) and neighbouring rights (Label
Music Business Development Manager) markets. And when you take into account the
level of music consumption on that region it is not suprising to see where the
positions will be based: Tokyo, Singapore or Seoul.
So… just questioning out loud: is
Facebook making a pivot in its core business or this is just a side strategy to
mitigate its mainly data-related concerns and the impact produced in the
stock-market, by rising the shares value through other business divisions? Or has
been Facebook pushed and put into rush by the September 2016
EC proposal of a new copyright Directive for the online environment and the
so much discussed article 13 proposal?
We will have to see what the future
brings here, but of two things we are sure: one is that being a serious bet of
Facebook, its music service’s main rivals will include not only traditional
players but also the likes of Amazon and YouTube (which is said to have a
strategy of adding so many ads to its regular music videos that users will have
to subscribe to new music service REMIX here);
the other is that maybe, and just maybe, Facebook will offer us as much music
and AV copyright matters to study and debate as it provides on privacy and data
protection.”
Without any clear view of just what "music business" means in the Facebook context, it is difficult to ascribe any value to this article.
ReplyDelete