Did you survive the hottest days of the year (at least in some parts of Europe) and still want to know what is happening in
the IP blogosphere?
Let’s find out it in this new edition of Around the IP blogs, which has a special focus on non-conventional trade marks, in particular, colours trade marks, smell, packaging and three dimensional marks.
Copyright
The 1709 Blog deals with the US District Court, Southern District of New York decision ruling that Warhol's 1984 "Prince Series" did not infringe Lynn Goldsmith's copyright on a Prince's photograph shot in 1981 for Newsweek which was never published.
Let’s find out it in this new edition of Around the IP blogs, which has a special focus on non-conventional trade marks, in particular, colours trade marks, smell, packaging and three dimensional marks.
 |
| This Kat wants to have the latest IP news |
Copyright
The 1709 Blog deals with the US District Court, Southern District of New York decision ruling that Warhol's 1984 "Prince Series" did not infringe Lynn Goldsmith's copyright on a Prince's photograph shot in 1981 for Newsweek which was never published.
Trade marks
The Kluwer Trade Mark Blog published a post concerning the decision of the Court of Venice regarding the producer of the famous Veuve Cliquot champagne
and its colour jaune orange trade mark.
Still the Kluwer Trade Mark Blog deals with the protection of smell and packaging from imitation
and with the C-237/19, a preliminary ruling recently referred to the
Court of Justice of the European Union by the Supreme Court of
Hungary and concerning three-dimensional marks.
Finally the Kluwer Trade Mark Blog reports on the coming into force on June 17, 2019 of
Canada’s new trade mark law.
Patents
The Kluwer Patent Blog publishes a post concerning the patent prosecution estoppel and a post concerning the applicant’s right to re-establish under
certain circumstances.
Around the IP blogs!
Reviewed by Antonella Gentile
on
Sunday, July 28, 2019
Rating:
Reviewed by Antonella Gentile
on
Sunday, July 28, 2019
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html