Blending in with the easter bunny |
What can be better than a Sunday stuffed with easter eggs? A Sunday stuffed with easter eggs and IP news...
Patents
On 28 March 2020 amendments to
Germany’s Act on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in Humans
(Gesetz zur Verhütung und Bekämpfung von Infektionskrankheiten beim Menschen –
Infektionsschutzgesetz) came into force. This measurement was taken in view of
the COVID-19 pandemic. Inter alia, the amended confers upon the Federal
Ministry of Health additional powers to control the epidemic situation,
including the competence to order limitations on patents. Kluwer Patent Blog reports
on all the details of the amendment and what it means for patents.
A preliminary injunction, based
on alleged infringement of a Standard Essential Patent, held by a
Non-Practicing Entity, was dismissed by the Hague Court of Appeal on 17 March
2020. This was based on a balancing of
interests, without an assessment of validity and infringement of the patent in
suit, and without assessment of FRAND-related obligations. Kluwer Patent Blog provides
the full details of this matter between of Sisvel and Xiaomi.
A ruling on employees’
inventions, with reference to the right to fair compensation, was delivered
by the Italian Supreme Court issued on 20 January 2020. Three different
situations for employees’ inventions were discussed in the case. EPLaw discusses
the calculation of fair compensation of employed inventors, as provided for in
the judgement.
Can patents and trade secrets
co-exist? In the midst of all the COVID-19 associated disruption, the Delhi
High Court has rendered an important decision on the interplay between trade
secrets and patents with potential far reaching consequences. Spicy IP reports
on the decision.
The USPTO Director has authority to extend deadlines to account for the current COVID-19 emergency in terms of the CARES Act. In short, most prosecution deadlines between March 27 and April 30 are eligible for a 30-day extension if filed with a statement that the delay “is due to the COVID-19 outbreak” and some party involved with the prosecution “was personally affected.” Patentlyo provides all the necessary information.
Trademarks
In light of the COVID-19 crisis,
Austria adopted legal measurements to extends deadlines. Kluwer Trademark Blog provides
information on deadlines that are extended.
Is storing infringing goods enough
to give rise to trademark liability? In a highly-anticipated decision involving
Amazon and the German arm of cosmetics giant Coty, the European Union’s held
that it is not enough for an e-commerce platform operator, such as Amazon, to
merely store and distribute orders consisting of unauthorized or infringing
goods in order to be found liable for trademark infringement. The Fashion Law provides
all the information of this judgement.
Copyright
A student and a professor, who
reproduced certain parts of the student’s work without the student’s consent,
met in the Spanish Supreme Court. The issue of originality of academic works was
addressed. The Court also provided guidance on authorship of a
University work. Kluwer Copyright Blog reports on the ruling.
The implementation clock of the CDSM
Directive is ticking. The new directive on copyright in the digital single
market entered into force on 7 June 2019, giving the Member States two years to
implement its provisions. CREATe reports on the Member States’ progress on the
implementation of the Directive.
Other
Oracle is partnering with the
White House to study unproven pharmaceuticals for treating COVID-19. WrittenDescription unpacks this story and shares their thoughts in a short explainer.
Around the IP blogs
Reviewed by Magdaleen Jooste
on
Sunday, April 12, 2020
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html