 |
| An angry cat |
The German Bundestag has approved draft legislation to ratify the Unified Patent Court Agreement and this news hit the IP Blogosphere. ManagingIP, the European IP Helpdesk, the HGF blog, and the Juve Patent Blog each shared their opinion regarding the future of the UPC, including threats of new constitutional complaints, which might stop the project altogether.
The SpicyIP Blog featured an extensive overview of patent-related issues regarding the three most advanced vaccines against COVID. The blog considered questions such as the impact of patent finding on the allocation of patent rights, and mechanisms put in place to facilitate the access to vaccines in developing countries.
Trade Marks
The Fashion Law Blog looked into how luxury brands are expanding the scope of their trade marks to also cover face masks. An Inevitable part of the COVID-19 reality, masks are now branded with fashion ornaments. Not surprisingly, the right holders are having to contend with a yet another category of counterfeit goods.
Other
If you still have not gotten into the Christmas mood (and exploring legal topics outside of IP as part of your New Year’s resolutions-to-be), check the D-Kart’s antitrust advent calendar for 2020. Each day, a different competition law expert is interviewed on the most significant competition law case or law development in his or her jurisdiction.
Our cousin blog, the IPTango, shared the news that the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) has launched English and Spanish versions of its website. This redesign is part of the INPI’s expansion of the international scope of its services.
Around the IP Blogs
Reviewed by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
on
Sunday, December 13, 2020
Rating:
Reviewed by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
on
Sunday, December 13, 2020
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html