IFIM Holiday Seminar – Tales of the New Doctors of Law


The Institute for Intellectual Property and Market Law (IFIM) at Stockholm University, of which I have the honour and pleasure of being the new Director, is organizing a new event which will be of interest to those working on and researching the following topics:
  • Damages in IP cases
  • Copyright exceptions and limitations
  • Fairness in EU copyright
Entitled 'IFIM Holiday Seminar – Tales of the New Doctors of Law', this event, which will be held online on 17 December, is an opportunity to hear from researchers who have successfully defended their PhD thesis in 2020 [at least some good news this year!]. It has been indeed the tradition of IFIM for several years to feature, as speakers at its Holiday Seminar, junior academics and lawyers. This year’s event is no exception and IFIM is thrilled to have:
  • David Johansson, speaking on 'Damages in an IP context', with a commentary by fellow Kat Frantzeska
  • Tito Rendas, speaking on 'Exceptions in EU copyright law: in search of a balance between flexibility and legal certainty', with a commentary by Jan Rosén
  • Giulia Priora, speaking on 'EU copyright law and distributive justice theories: a forgotten legacy?', with a commentary by myself.
The welcome remarks will be delivered by the Chair of the IFIM Board, Per Jonas Nordell.

If you're interested in attending, please click here!
IFIM Holiday Seminar – Tales of the New Doctors of Law IFIM Holiday Seminar – Tales of the New Doctors of Law Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Wednesday, December 02, 2020 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.