On this, lovely Saturday morning, let's have a look at what the Kats were up to last week...
 |
| Enjoying a fantastic brunch this morning... |
PATENTS
The Australian High Court overturned
150 years of precedent to adopt exhaustion of rights doctrine for patented
products. Rose
Hughes reported on the case of Calidad v Epson with regards to
an implied license versus exhaustion of rights.
The EPO has released the first
detailed information for candidates on the arrangements for the online pre-EQE
and EQE next year. Rose
Hughes summarised the important information.
OTHER IP TOPICS: IP EVENTS, AI, BLOCKING
INJUNCTION, THE QUEEN’S GAMBIT
The Institute for Intellectual
Property and Market Law (IFIM) at Stockholm University, of which Eleonora
Rosati have the honour and pleasure of being the new Director, is
organizing a new event which will be held on 17 December 2020 on the topic “IFIM
Holiday Seminar – Tales of the New Doctors of Law”.
Is it time to move on from the AI
inventor debate? Rose
Hughes discussed the topic of AI inventors and inventions.
Wondering how to draft an order for a
website blocking injunction? The High
Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales has come out with another ruling concerning
blocking injunctions, this time in the case of Matchroom Boxing Ltd and
another v British Telecommunications plc and others [2020] EWHC 2868 (Ch). Frantzeska
Papadopoulou reported on the case.
What happens when success brings not
only its own reward but also rewards others, who may be competitors? Neil
Wilkof considered the story of “The Queen’s Gambit”.
Reviewed by Magdaleen Jooste
on
Saturday, December 12, 2020
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html