Back by popular demand, it's time to nominate your favourite IP books of this year! Despite the horror that has been 2020, the IP community has continued to produce books for us, to keep us busy throughout lockdown, many of which have been reviewed for you by the IPKat. IPKat readers have already been in touch asking for their chance to vote for their favourite book of 2020. So, here it is:
Vote for your best IP book of 2020 by taking the survey here
PLEASE IN THE NAME OF CHRISTMAS only complete the survey once!
If you vote multiply times for the same book, only one of those votes will be counted. [Whilst it may allow you to place 94 votes for your own book, from the other end we can see it's the same person and therefore only 1 vote will be counted.] Thank you.
 |
| Take your pick! |
As always, readers can vote for books in 5 categories: Patents, Copyright, Trade Mark, Design and Intellectual Property.
Only votes for books published in 2020 will count. Please provide the author's name and title of the book in your votes.
Place your vote before 30th December 2020 and the results will be announced in January 2021.
You can check out last year's 2019 nominees and winners here and the 2018 winners here.
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Monday, December 07, 2020
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn ![[Guest post] Can AI be considered a PHOSITA? Policy debates in the US and the EU](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggxDO6mW5r4n3-06Af5ckmIaMIhzgPJBoDP8AUsSYXY2zajUQt1ObGVn_GhCgidbG_YDVnybQuJ5XoAjjBG9Ws2xJWDQHNPMrLkn526SWIG371X_Kjt1E8tJmn8Ae_20Phyphenhyphen09JeuUOhhTR3aZE9lMRQlqHGQGcAWGxlo91rrKcLk0AfUjWCvw6RQ/s72-c/Two-cats-eating.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html