IPKat-approved Catz Cafè in Düsseldorf |
An invitation-only conference, this event aims to bring together 70 leaders from across IP, patent management and brand protection to discover emerging technologies, increase protection and develop lasting connections.
This year’s agenda, which features several speakers from a variety of backgrounds (including leading companies and the judiciary), focuses among other things on the newly established UPC’s first court cases, the rise of generative AI, and an increasing attempt to focus on a more employee-centric IP strategy.
The conference also offers a variety of formats, including roundtable discussions, case studies, 1:1 meetings, and presentations from some of the most respected experts in the IP field.
As mentioned, this is in invitation-only event. To secure an invitation, an attendee must have an active project within their function, and must answer ‘yes’ to two of the following criteria:
- I control where the IP, Patent, Trademark, Brand Protection or Anti-Counterfeiting budget is spent
- I am the Head of IP, or Head of Patent, Trademark, Brand Protection or Anti-Counterfeiting
- I have a personal annual budget of £500,000 or above
- I have an active requirement for intellectual property solutions within the next 6 - 12 months
Click here for more details and to request an invitation.
Global IP Exchange Europe conference returns to Düsseldorf on 11-12 March
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, January 29, 2024
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html