Catch-up on last week's IP news and events with the IPKat!
Copyright
 |
| The IPKat keeping up with the latest IP news (while taking a quick nap) |
Oliver Fairhurst analyzed the Kidron amendments in relation to the intersection of artificial intelligence and copyright law.
Katfriend Seun Lari-Williams provided a guest post examining Nigeria's recent copyright law.
Patents
Katfriend Adanna Onah discussed a recent South African decision on patent entitlement and interim relief in the pharma sector.
Rose Hughes explored the challenges and approaches to defining a cell and what this means for devising an effective IP strategy.
Rose Hughes reported on the first decision from the Unified Patent Court (UPC) to address the specific issue of second medical use claims in patent litigation.
Rose Hughes discussed a recent reent EPO Board of Appeal which argued that a Large Language Model (LLM) does not yet qualify as a "person skilled in the art" in patent examination.
Trade marks
Marcel Pemsel delved into the ongoing implications of Brexit for intellectual property, particularly concerning the Advocate General (‘AG’) Ćapeta’s opinion in EUIPO v Nowhere (C-337/22).
Katfriend Diego Guerrero Obando provided a guest post discussing the exhaustion of trademark rights within a particular legal framework of a Dutch ruling on the burden of proof.
Marcel Pemsel discussed the legal implications surrounding Glaxo's color trade mark for inhalers.
General IP News and Policy
Jocelyn Bosse reported on the UK government's announcement regarding its intellectual property policy.
Do you want to reuse the IPKat content? Please refer to our
Policies section.
If you have any queries or requests for permission, please get in touch with the IPKat team.
Comments
Post a Comment
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html