Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for Board of Appeal
Breitling for women? More like bad faith for women, says the EUIPO Breitling for women? More like bad faith for women, says the EUIPO Reviewed by Söğüt Atilla-Aydın on Saturday, March 14, 2026 Rating: 5
EUIPO’s Board of Appeal Grants Salvation to MONASTERY EUIPO’s Board of Appeal Grants Salvation to MONASTERY Reviewed by Kliment Markov on Tuesday, September 30, 2025 Rating: 5
Fordham 32 (Post 2): Judicial Landscape, the UPC and BSH v Electrolux Fordham 32 (Post 2): Judicial Landscape, the UPC and BSH v Electrolux Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Friday, April 25, 2025 Rating: 5
Use versus process patents: Implications for novelty and scope (T 1913/21) Use versus process patents: Implications for novelty and scope (T 1913/21) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Wednesday, April 09, 2025 Rating: 5
The Oktoberfest is fair game The Oktoberfest is fair game Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Monday, January 20, 2025 Rating: 5
Epitope claims stand firm: Board of Appeal upholds functional antibody patent despite insufficiency attack (T 0326/22) Epitope claims stand firm: Board of Appeal upholds functional antibody patent despite insufficiency attack (T 0326/22) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Sunday, January 19, 2025 Rating: 5
Board of Appeal finds that human/pig chimeras are a risk to human dignity (T 1553/22) Board of Appeal finds that human/pig chimeras are a risk to human dignity (T 1553/22) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Wednesday, January 15, 2025 Rating: 5
EUIPO’s Board of Appeal: Motion mark for an opening window lacks distinctiveness and only shows a technical process EUIPO’s Board of Appeal: Motion mark for an opening window lacks distinctiveness and only shows a technical process Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Monday, December 16, 2024 Rating: 5
Navigating Re-Establishment of Rights at the EPO: Key Takeaways from T 0178/23 Navigating Re-Establishment of Rights at the EPO: Key Takeaways from T 0178/23 Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Friday, December 06, 2024 Rating: 5
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Reviewed by Asude Sena Moya on Tuesday, October 22, 2024 Rating: 5
Is Elton confusingly similar with Elon? Is Elton confusingly similar with Elon? Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Monday, September 16, 2024 Rating: 5
No rose without a thorn: L’Oréal could not prove fame of its LANCÔME rose device No rose without a thorn: L’Oréal could not prove fame of its LANCÔME rose device Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Monday, September 09, 2024 Rating: 5
Board of Appeal confirmed: Short jingle not protectable as a sound mark Board of Appeal confirmed: Short jingle not protectable as a sound mark Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Tuesday, April 23, 2024 Rating: 5

Meatless in Paris

When an earlier sign consists of two words and the later mark consists of the same two words but in reversed order, the German Federal Pate...
- Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Meatless in Paris Meatless in Paris Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.