Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for Convatec
Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not over Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not over Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Thursday, July 30, 2015 Rating: 5
Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrong Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrong Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Wednesday, July 08, 2015 Rating: 5
Round, round: how to round? How do we round? Round, round: how to round? How do we round? Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Sunday, June 28, 2015 Rating: 5
The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Wednesday, January 01, 2014 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.