Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for adidas
The simple math of adidas v Nike: Two stripes are not three stripes The simple math of adidas v Nike: Two stripes are not three stripes Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Sunday, July 28, 2024 Rating: 5
Colour inversion does not alter distinctive character – if the trade mark is sufficiently distinctive Colour inversion does not alter distinctive character – if the trade mark is sufficiently distinctive Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Wednesday, June 28, 2023 Rating: 5
General Court confirms invalidity of (one of the) adidas three-stripe mark(s) General Court confirms invalidity of (one of the) adidas three-stripe mark(s) Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Wednesday, June 19, 2019 Rating: 5
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case Reviewed by Alberto Bellan on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 Rating: 5
Five stripes and you're out -- The GC on decorative marks Five stripes and you're out -- The GC on decorative marks Reviewed by Alberto Bellan on Tuesday, June 24, 2014 Rating: 5

The stripes strike back

Adidas may not have been doing too well in making out infringement of its three stripes in the EU, but, according to Footwear News , they...
- Monday, May 12, 2008
The stripes strike back The stripes strike back Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, May 12, 2008 Rating: 5
Scoop - Freihältebedürfnis goes to the ECJ Scoop - Freihältebedürfnis goes to the ECJ Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, February 16, 2007 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.