Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for compensation for employees' patents
Daniel Alexander KC says "no" on indemnity costs, blanket confidentiality orders and permission to appeal in Oxford University Innovation dispute Daniel Alexander KC says "no" on indemnity costs, blanket confidentiality orders and permission to appeal in Oxford University Innovation dispute Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Tuesday, January 31, 2023 Rating: 5
What was the relevant undertaking? Further comments on Unilever v Shanks [2019] UKSC 45 What was the relevant undertaking? Further comments on Unilever v Shanks [2019] UKSC 45 Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Friday, November 01, 2019 Rating: 5
BREAKING: UKSC finds Unilever is not too big to pay - Shanks v Unilever [2019] UKSC 45 BREAKING: UKSC finds Unilever is not too big to pay - Shanks v Unilever [2019] UKSC 45 Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Wednesday, October 23, 2019 Rating: 5
No compensation, no consolation -- or no thanks, Shanks No compensation, no consolation -- or no thanks, Shanks Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, May 27, 2014 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.