Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for outstanding benefit
What was the relevant undertaking? Further comments on Unilever v Shanks [2019] UKSC 45 What was the relevant undertaking? Further comments on Unilever v Shanks [2019] UKSC 45 Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Friday, November 01, 2019 Rating: 5
BREAKING: UKSC finds Unilever is not too big to pay - Shanks v Unilever [2019] UKSC 45 BREAKING: UKSC finds Unilever is not too big to pay - Shanks v Unilever [2019] UKSC 45 Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Wednesday, October 23, 2019 Rating: 5
No compensation, no consolation -- or no thanks, Shanks No compensation, no consolation -- or no thanks, Shanks Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, May 27, 2014 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.