Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for prosecution history
[UPCKat] UPC Court of Appeal’s PI ruling leaves open the possibility of using prosecution history as an aid for claim construction [UPCKat] UPC Court of Appeal’s PI ruling leaves open the possibility of using prosecution history as an aid for claim construction Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Friday, July 26, 2024 Rating: 5
An unimpressed LJ Floyd strikes out Regen Lab's UK appeal (Regen v Estar) An unimpressed LJ Floyd strikes out Regen Lab's UK appeal (Regen v Estar) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Thursday, April 23, 2020 Rating: 5
Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, February 04, 2019 Rating: 5
Prosecution history - as relevant as any inventor evidence? Prosecution history - as relevant as any inventor evidence? Reviewed by Eibhlin Vardy on Friday, January 19, 2018 Rating: 5
A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and on A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and on Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Friday, June 26, 2015 Rating: 5
Actavis v Lilly - An Arnoldian Treasure Chest Actavis v Lilly - An Arnoldian Treasure Chest Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Thursday, May 15, 2014 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.