Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for purposive construction
Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, February 04, 2019 Rating: 5
Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-World Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-World Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Wednesday, October 24, 2018 Rating: 5
Regeneron v Kymab - Part II: Interpretation and Infringement Regeneron v Kymab - Part II: Interpretation and Infringement Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Friday, April 06, 2018 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.