Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for invalid priority
Clarity is needed from the Boards of Appeal on the EPO's "co-applicant approach" to priority Clarity is needed from the Boards of Appeal on the EPO's "co-applicant approach" to priority Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Thursday, November 28, 2019 Rating: 5
Fordham 27 (Report 14): Priority Fordham 27 (Report 14): Priority Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Thursday, May 02, 2019 Rating: 5
Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-World Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-World Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Wednesday, October 24, 2018 Rating: 5

Around the IP Blogs!

Take a tour of the IP blogosphere with IPKat! Highlights this week include a series of articles on the impact of brexit on the patent system...
- Friday, October 05, 2018
Around the IP Blogs! Around the IP Blogs! Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Friday, October 05, 2018 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.