In an article in the New York Times reminiscent of certain parts of Naomi Klein’s No Logo (tie-in website here), Alissa Quart (reviews of her Branded here and here) has slammed the encroachment of brands into pretty much every aspect of school life in the United States. The issue has been brought into focus by the decision of certain school boards to ban junk foods from vending machines in the school grounds because of the link between such foods and teenage obesity. Quart goes one further, arguing that the pupils “soak up” the branding on such products. However, this is only the tip of the iceberg, with sponsorship taking many forms, including advertising in corridors, educational materials sponsored by companies, field trips to shopping centres and Channel One a school television network that shows advertising.
For example, Quart reports:

“One teenager from Texas who attends a school sponsored by a soda company recently told me that she was not allowed to drink other sodas in school and then was coerced into covering her textbooks with paper bearing the logo and the image of that brand of soda.”

Should IP lawyers feel guilty? Well, at least a little. The branding gets into schools through sponsorship deals and someone has to draw up those deals. Also, the tangible symbol of the brand ideals that are being foisted on to schoolchildren is our good friend the trade mark -- but please feel free to differ…

Channel One, the US TV network for schools here.
Field Trip Factory, which sends children on field trips to the shops of its corporate sponsors here.

BRANDED FROM A YOUNG AGE <strong>BRANDED FROM A YOUNG AGE</strong> Reviewed by Unknown on Thursday, July 17, 2003 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.