NAMED AND SHAMED

The UK Patent Office, concerned by certain cases where the loser in inter partes trade mark opposition cases has failed to pay his share of the winner’s costs, has published a list of defaulting losing parties in an attempt to encourage them to pay up without the need for further legal action. The Registrar doesn’t actually have the power to enforce the cost orders but can impose security for costs on parties engaged in proceedings if he believes that they will not honour any costs orders made against them. A survey to investigate the extent of the unpaid costs problem has also been launched.
NAMED AND SHAMED <strong>NAMED AND SHAMED</strong> Reviewed by Unknown on Wednesday, July 16, 2003 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.