An interesting example of viral advertising from across the Pond. Nissan is pirating its own advertisements for Nissan Almeiras. Ordinary advertisements for Almeiras are posted but overnight they are seemingly graffitied with, for example, stereo speakers and the address www.electricmoyo.com. Other adverts are fly-posted and are meant to look like “street art” and Nissan radio adverts are supposedly hijacked by the voice of Electric Moyo (examples here). A visit to the Electric Moyo website reveals that, underneath all the “cool jargon”, it’s all a Nissan publicity stunt. On entering the site, the following message appears:
"Much respect to Nissan for allowing us to use their billboards and radio commercials as works of art, representing the kultcha of Electric MOYO and promoting our message of freedom, access and respect. These works of artistic messaging would not have been possible without Nissan's permission, and as a result our works are more powerful and farther reaching. The message of Electric MOYO is not about vandalism and does not promote it. My message is about harnessing the power of responsible artistic expression with corporate participation to bring about more freedom, access and respect for myself and the people of Electric MOYO."
Nissan’s senior manager for youth and urban communications has been quoted as saying: “We've been looking for innovative ways to communicate with forward-thinking, media-savvy multicultural youth”. This looks a bit like an attempt to get as many buzz-words as possible in a single sentence and I’m not really how the “multicultural youth” will take to a car company pretending to be a cultural collective.
Read more about the story here and here.
The title of this piece is taken from the Electric Moyo site. Need I say more?
"Much respect to Nissan for allowing us to use their billboards and radio commercials as works of art, representing the kultcha of Electric MOYO and promoting our message of freedom, access and respect. These works of artistic messaging would not have been possible without Nissan's permission, and as a result our works are more powerful and farther reaching. The message of Electric MOYO is not about vandalism and does not promote it. My message is about harnessing the power of responsible artistic expression with corporate participation to bring about more freedom, access and respect for myself and the people of Electric MOYO."
Nissan’s senior manager for youth and urban communications has been quoted as saying: “We've been looking for innovative ways to communicate with forward-thinking, media-savvy multicultural youth”. This looks a bit like an attempt to get as many buzz-words as possible in a single sentence and I’m not really how the “multicultural youth” will take to a car company pretending to be a cultural collective.
Read more about the story here and here.
The title of this piece is taken from the Electric Moyo site. Need I say more?
A LETTER TO THOSE WHO HAVE EARS THAT SEE
![<strong>A LETTER TO THOSE WHO HAVE EARS THAT SEE</strong>]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Tuesday, July 22, 2003
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html