The IPKat’s masters have been quite productive recently. Apart from Ilanah’s article in the EIPR (see “Far Too Modest”, blogged yesterday), there’s quite a bit of interesting work in the pipeline.
• Jeremy and Ilanah’s paper, “Going Down in History: Does History Have anything to Offer the Intellectual Property Lawyer?” is now finished and awaits publication along with the other papers given in the same seminar series.
• Jeremy and Ilanah have also drafted an article, “No Marks for Hitler: a Radical Reappraisal of Trade Mark Use and Political Sensitivity”, which is currently in search of a journal to publish it.
• Jeremy’s paper, “Databases, the Human rights Act and EU Law”, has now been revised for publication later this year by Oxford University Press in its collection of seminar papers on the Freedom of Expression and Copyright seminar hosted by Queen Mary, University of London, last year.
Any of our readers who would like to see any of these papers should send us an email and we will be pleased to oblige.
• Jeremy and Ilanah’s paper, “Going Down in History: Does History Have anything to Offer the Intellectual Property Lawyer?” is now finished and awaits publication along with the other papers given in the same seminar series.
• Jeremy and Ilanah have also drafted an article, “No Marks for Hitler: a Radical Reappraisal of Trade Mark Use and Political Sensitivity”, which is currently in search of a journal to publish it.
• Jeremy’s paper, “Databases, the Human rights Act and EU Law”, has now been revised for publication later this year by Oxford University Press in its collection of seminar papers on the Freedom of Expression and Copyright seminar hosted by Queen Mary, University of London, last year.
Any of our readers who would like to see any of these papers should send us an email and we will be pleased to oblige.
SOMETHING TO READ?
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Thursday, February 05, 2004
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html