Another new Sweet & Maxwell title to hit the bookshops this year is the sixth edition of Intellectual Property Law and Taxation, by Nigel A. Eastaway, Richard J. Gallafent and Victor A. F. Dauppe. This hardback edition, consisting of nearly 800 pages, “is addressed primarily to those who wish to use intellectual property law and taxation for legitimate ends”. The IPKat hopes that this honest declaration does not unduly restrict the sales potential of this popular work, which features some enjoyable and highly plausible Case Studies. Anyone whose eyes glaze over on seeing detailed analysis of tax law can thus take refuge in the tales of Albert Potcher, bricklayer extraordinary, the pop group Brighton Rock, the conductor/composer Yuri Rakovsky and Nuttabun “”Fast Food for the Third Millennium”). The authors bring to bear their blend of business nous, intellectual property expertise and accounting skills in a seamless web of valuable tax teaching, current to July 2003.

The price (£160) for a specialist book on a subject of this nature is no longer dear and, for any reader who uses it profitably, the IPKat imagines that it will pay for itself. If you are an IP creator (or advise one) and generate income on which you wish to minimise your tax liability, read it!
IPKAT BOOK NOTICE: IP LAW AND TAXATION IPKAT BOOK NOTICE: IP LAW AND TAXATION Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.